EF » EFnet » FELU Research » Superiority of Monte Carlo simulation in valuing real options within public–private partnerships

Superiority of Monte Carlo simulation in valuing real options within public–private partnerships

27.10.2017Comments are closed.

Keywords:

public-private partnership,
real options,
infrastructure projects,
capital budgeting decisions,
guarantees,
Monte Carlo simulation,
geometric Brownian motion

Author(s):

Abstract:

Monte Carlo simulation and geometric Brownian motion are the two methods employed for valuation of guarantees in public-private partnership projects. In this article we argue that any guarantee within the projects that exhibit non-constant growth rate of demand should always be evaluated by using Monte Carlo simulation. Namely, we find that in a typical infrastructure project geometric Brownian motion underestimates cash flows and overestimates the value of the granted guarantee of public partner. In economic terms, our results imply more implemented projects, which are urgently needed, and thus a higher impact on economic well-being through better risks sharing mechanisms and project risk management. We also contribute to the literature by arguing that proper capture of the growth rate is much more important than the proper capture of volatility, already reported in the field.

Journal:

Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan

Indexing:

A3, IF 0,519

 


Related news

Publish your comment:


RSSUpcoming events

When we are studying, working or living in a foreign country, homesickness is a usual and inevitable reaction. We are missing to what we ... >>>
All ambitious students are invited to attend the International Full Time Master Programme in Business and Organization (IMB) open days that will be held ... >>>
2020 RSA Annual Conference Transformations: Relational Spaces, beyond Urban and Rural 17th-20th June 2020, Ljubljana, Slovenia Organised by the Regional Studies Association in partnership ... >>>